Austin Peay
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,571  Wesley Gray SO 34:31
1,744  Hezron Kiptoo FR 34:44
1,831  Tyler Smith FR 34:51
2,137  Daniel Hamm SR 35:26
2,484  Nash Young FR 36:17
2,546  Kyle Harmon SR 36:28
2,652  Nick Piskor JR 36:52
2,720  Martin Rejman JR 37:11
2,849  Andrew Abel FR 37:54
National Rank #239 of 312
South Region Rank #25 of 40
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 25th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Wesley Gray Hezron Kiptoo Tyler Smith Daniel Hamm Nash Young Kyle Harmon Nick Piskor Martin Rejman Andrew Abel
Rhodes Invitational 09/17 1291 35:06 34:41 34:49 34:59 36:08 36:42 36:31 37:57
APSU Cross Country Invitational 09/24 1361 36:55 35:08 35:06 36:07 36:29 36:22 37:48 38:19
JSU Foothills Invitational 10/01 1304 34:32 34:29 34:52 36:54 36:11 36:18 36:48 37:13 37:35
Jenna Strong Invitational 10/14 1293 34:24 35:09 35:23 35:27 35:27 36:49 37:54 38:51 37:24
Ohio Valley Championship 10/29 1294 33:53 35:11 34:29 35:11 38:01 37:21 36:54 38:43
South Region Championships 11/11 34:17 34:27 34:50





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 24.4 746 0.4 19.9 33.6 35.9 9.2 1.2 0.1



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Wesley Gray 117.4
Hezron Kiptoo 130.5
Tyler Smith 137.4
Daniel Hamm 163.5
Nash Young 191.9
Kyle Harmon 197.5
Nick Piskor 209.4




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 0.4% 0.4 22
23 19.9% 19.9 23
24 33.6% 33.6 24
25 35.9% 35.9 25
26 9.2% 9.2 26
27 1.2% 1.2 27
28 0.1% 0.1 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0